Why Two Patients Pay Different Amounts for the Same Treatment
- Khushi Berry
- 2 days ago
- 3 min read
It is a common and frustrating reality in Indian healthcare: two patients undergoing the same treatment can end up paying drastically different amounts. Sometimes the difference is minor, but in many cases it runs into lakhs of rupees. This raises an important question—why do patients pay different amounts for the same treatment, and is this difference justified?
The primary reason lies in how hospitals price care. Unlike regulated sectors, hospital billing is highly variable and influenced by multiple non-clinical factors. The treatment may be identical, but the pricing structure around it can differ significantly.
Hospital type plays a major role. Corporate hospitals, trust hospitals, government hospitals, and nursing homes all follow different pricing models. Corporate hospitals often charge more due to higher infrastructure costs, branding, and administrative overheads. Meanwhile, smaller or non-profit hospitals may offer the same treatment at a lower cost while maintaining acceptable clinical standards.
Room category is one of the most overlooked yet impactful factors. In many hospitals, choosing a higher room category automatically increases doctor fees, nursing charges, and even investigation costs. Two patients in different room categories can receive the same treatment but be billed very differently. Many patients are unaware of this linkage until they see the final bill.
Doctor fees also vary widely. Senior consultants, specialists with high demand, or doctors associated with premium hospitals often charge higher fees. While expertise matters, the cost difference is not always proportional to outcome differences, especially for standardized treatments.
Another major factor is billing for consumables and medicines. Hospitals may procure the same items at similar costs but bill them at different markups. One patient may receive branded consumables, while another receives generic alternatives, leading to price variation without a clear explanation.
Insurance status further widens the gap. Cash-paying patients and insured patients are often billed differently. Package rates, exclusions, non-payable items, and insurer-hospital agreements all influence final out-of-pocket costs. Ironically, insured patients sometimes end up paying more due to uncovered items and administrative charges.
Timing and length of stay also affect billing. A patient who recovers quickly and is discharged on time may pay less than someone whose stay is extended due to minor delays or hospital protocols. These extensions may not always be medically necessary but can significantly inflate costs.
Negotiation and awareness create another divide. Patients who understand billing structures, ask questions, or seek expert support often pay less than those who accept bills at face value. This difference has little to do with treatment quality and more to do with information asymmetry.
Ultimately, two patients pay different amounts not because their treatment is different, but because the healthcare system lacks transparency and standardization. Pricing is influenced by choices patients may not even realize they are making.
At Health Samadhan, the focus is on bridging this gap. By reviewing bills, benchmarking costs, and highlighting unjustified differences, patients gain clarity and confidence. The goal is not to eliminate cost variation entirely, but to ensure that differences are fair, explained, and medically justified.
Healthcare should not be a guessing game. When patients understand why costs differ, they are better positioned to make informed decisions and protect themselves from unnecessary financial burden.
Health Samadhan operates as a patient-side hospital broker. Our mandate is simple: before a patient is admitted for any planned or elective procedure, we negotiate the hospital deal on their behalf. We review existing hospital quotes, benchmark them across multiple hospitals, and work through the financial structure of the admission packages, room categories, billing slabs, implants, non-payables, and insurance optimization.
We do not change doctors. We do not alter treatment plans. We do not compromise care. The medical decision remains between the patient and their doctor. Our role is to ensure that the financial outcome is fair, transparent, and optimized.
When patients are represented, outcomes change. Pricing becomes clearer. Options emerge. Out-of-pocket costs are reduced—not because care was downgraded, but because inefficiencies and opacity were eliminated. The same hospital, the same doctor, the same surgery can cost significantly less when negotiation happens before admission instead of after discharge.
The most crucial aspect of hospital brokering is aligning incentives. Without alignment, representation collapses into referral marketing. Health Samadhan operates on a pure success-fee model. If we do not reduce a patient’s out-of-pocket cost, we do not charge a fee. We do not take commissions from hospitals. We do not earn unless the patient benefits.
If this topic resonated, you may also find these Health Samadhan blogs useful:
Comments