top of page

Why Indians Negotiate Everything — Except Hospital Bills

  • Writer: Khushi Berry
    Khushi Berry
  • Jan 5
  • 5 min read

Indians are among the most skilled financial negotiators in the world. We question interest rates. We renegotiate rents. We compare EMIs, insurance premiums, fund expense ratios and brokerage fees. We switched plans to save a few hundred rupees a month. We hunt for cashback, debate over subscriptions, and proudly brag about discounts on flights and dining. We hire property brokers to negotiate real estate transactions and wealth advisors to optimise our investments.


And yet, when a ₹5–10 lakh hospital bill arrives, most families simply pay.

No negotiation. No benchmarking. No real questioning. Just acceptance — because it is a hospital, and because in that moment, pushing back feels uncomfortable, risky, or disrespectful. This silence, repeated millions of times across the country, has quietly become one of the biggest financial drains on the Indian middle class. And almost nobody speaks about it.


The starting point of this problem is a simple truth: private healthcare is a business. Hospitals run balance sheets and earnings targets. They optimise operational costs, revenue per bed, lengths of stay, and pricing strategies. Investors fund hospital groups because they generate predictable returns. None of this is immoral. It is simply a commercial reality. And in a commercial system, everyone negotiates — except the one stakeholder who actually lies on the hospital bed: the patient.


Insurers negotiate. Corporations negotiate. Government schemes negotiate. They work out contracted pricing, volume deals, caps, terms, and reimbursement structures. Hospitals have dedicated revenue management teams and pricing analysts to handle this. But when an ordinary family walks in for surgery or treatment, what they receive is a “standard package” — presented as fixed, universal, and non-negotiable. In truth, it is simply retail pricing.


Retail pricing exists everywhere — from hotels to airlines — but consumers rarely pay it if they have leverage. Institutions have leverage. Patients usually don’t. And the reason is not lack of intelligence. It is emotion.

Hospitalisation places families in a deeply vulnerable psychological state. When your wife needs a C-section, your father is admitted for cardiac surgery, or your child is being prepped for a procedure, the only priority is safety and recovery. You are anxious, exhausted, and desperate for reassurance. In that emotional state, most people simply do not have the bandwidth, confidence, or technical understanding required to challenge an estimate. Hospitals know this. So pricing discussions are often vague, brief, or deferred until treatment is underway. By the time the final bill appears, families are already emotionally committed — and compliance feels safer than pushback.


This is not about painting hospitals as villains. It is about recognising a structural imbalance of power. Large institutional buyers negotiate pricing on every line of healthcare spend. Patients do not. And because they do not, they pay more — sometimes significantly more — for the exact same treatment.

Many people assume that health insurance solves this gap. It does not. Insurance protects the insurer’s liability according to policy terms, not the total amount the hospital chooses to bill. Your insurance coverage still operates within a pricing environment shaped by negotiation. What the hospital charges, how packages are structured, how consumables are billed, how sub-limits are triggered, how room rent impacts overall billing, and how implants are priced — all of these factors influence the final out-of-pocket cost borne by the patient. Insurance pays what your policy allows. The rest is yours. That “rest” is often much larger than it needs to be.


We now have a situation where the wealthiest and most powerful players in healthcare negotiate aggressively — while the ordinary family, often spending a massive portion of their lifetime savings, walks in alone. That is the real market failure in Indian healthcare. Representation is unevenly distributed. Power is concentrated on one side of the table. And predictable outcomes follow.

This is the gap that Health Samadhan was built to correct.

If we are willing to use a broker to buy property and a financial advisor to manage investments, why do we accept that in the single largest unplanned spend of our lives — hospitalisation — we should enter the system without representation? Why should only insurers, corporates and government schemes benefit from negotiated hospital pricing? Why shouldn’t patients?


Health Samadhan is India’s first patient-side hospital broker. We exist solely to represent the financial interests of patients within the hospital ecosystem. We do not run hospitals. We do not sell insurance. We do not promote wellness products or consultations. We do one thing: before admission for any planned or elective procedure, we negotiate the total hospital package on behalf of the patient, exactly the way large institutional buyers do, so that the final out-of-pocket expense is reduced without changing the medical treatment.


The process is straightforward. A patient comes to us with their diagnosis and their current hospital recommendation or estimate. We study it, benchmark it, and then take the case to multiple hospitals — including the patient’s preferred choice. We negotiate the total package structure — not just the headline rate, but the true financial impact, including room category, billing slabs, implants, inclusions, exclusions, and non-payables. We do not compromise treatment quality or interfere medically. We ensure that patients are not overpaying simply because they are unrepresented. The patient then selects the option that best aligns with their comfort, the doctor's preference, and their budget.


Our business model is equally simple: we only earn when the patient actually saves. If there is no financial benefit, there is no fee. We do not receive commissions or referral revenue from hospitals — because that would defeat the purpose of our service. Our incentives are entirely aligned with the patient's interests. The better we negotiate, the more they save, and the more fairly we earn.

This is not charity. It is patient-side capitalism. It is the normalisation of negotiation rights for the individual, not just institutions. It is the extension of transparency, fairness, and representation into an area of life where they have been lacking for far too long.



The real question, then, is this:

Why do Indian families bargain ruthlessly on EMIs, rents, brokerage, and subscriptions — but remain silent at the hospital billing counter?

Fear plays a part. So does reverence. But beneath it all lies a long-standing belief that healthcare pricing is fixed, sacred, and unquestionable. It isn’t. It never has been. It is commercial. And in every commercial system, representation changes outcomes.

Healthcare will always be emotional. Hospital billing doesn’t have to be.

Insurers already have representation. Corporations already have representation. The government already has representation.

It’s time patients do too.

If you have a planned hospitalisation coming up — maternity, orthopaedic surgery, general surgery, cardiac care, or any elective procedure — you do not need to walk in alone anymore. You can walk in informed, represented, and in control.

And that shift, more than anything, is how fairness finally enters the Indian healthcare system.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page